Examiner-designed · AI-assisted · formative only

Get focused feedback on an A Level essay

Choose an original 40-mark question, paste your practice essay and receive a cautious draft mark with separate AO1/AO2 feedback, evidence, misconceptions and a specific redraft task.

Start with two free reviews See marking credits

Two complete reviews free No site essay history Human judgement remains essential

A closed feedback loop

Submit, diagnose, redraft

Choose the exact task

Questions are fixed to the site's own OCR-style practice bank, keeping the review focused and reducing prompt misuse.

Receive draft feedback

The assistant separates AO1 from AO2 and points to evidence in your response. It does not write a replacement essay.

Make the next attempt

Use the three priorities and paragraph clinic to redraft, then compare your reasoning with the first attempt.

Your first two reviews

Start practising here

Activate two free formative essay reviews in this browser. No payment or licence-key copying is needed. Choose a supported question, paste your practice essay and read the feedback before redrafting.

Access uses an essential browser cookie. Keep using the same browser for your credits. Essays and personal information do not belong in analytics.

I already have access →

Choose Check credits in the reviewer to see your balance.

See the approach

What useful feedback looks like

This short demonstration was written for this page. It is not a real student's result, a live AI output or a marked complete essay.

Practice paragraph

Hick argues that suffering gives people opportunities to become courageous and compassionate. This is a strength because a world without any danger would not allow courage to develop. However, some suffering kills people before they can learn anything, so not all suffering seems to help soul-making.

AO1: what is working

You accurately connect Hick's soul-making with freely developed virtues. Add epistemic distance and explain why a stable, challenging world matters.

AO2: improve next

Your objection is relevant. Test Hick's reply that development can continue beyond death, then judge whether that reply explains suffering or depends on an additional unverified belief.

Redraft task: Add two sentences explaining Hick's strongest reply, then one reasoned judgement answering whether soul-making justifies apparently destructive suffering.

A complete review also offers separate AO1/AO2 draft marks, priorities, evidence and a paragraph clinic. Marks are estimates for practice and need human judgement.

Try this with your own essay

Essay review workspace

Paste a practice essay

Do not include your name, school, email address or other personal information. The site does not create a student profile or public essay record; see the privacy note for limited service-log retention by the infrastructure providers.

Previous Payhip licence key (optional)New free and paid credits use private access in this browser. If you bought a Payhip key before the Stripe change, paste it here.

OCR-style 40-mark question Your practice essayMinimum 300 words; maximum 12,000 characters.0 words

Before you submit I am 13 or over. If I am under 18, I am using this study tool with the knowledge of a parent, guardian or teacher. I understand that this is AI-generated formative feedback, not an official OCR mark, predicted grade or teacher assessment. I have removed names and personal information, and I have read the AI essay-review privacy note.

Two free, then pay only when you practise

Marking-credit packs

Stripe checkout adds credits to your private access in this browser after payment is confirmed. Each completed review uses one credit; checking a balance uses none. Keep your private access link safe to restore access elsewhere.

2reviews

Two free reviews

Try the complete AO1/AO2 feedback workflow on two essays.

FreeClaim two free reviews ↗

5reviews

Five review credits

A focused top-up for one topic or a short run of timed essays.

£4.99Buy 5 credits ↗

15reviews

Fifteen review credits

Enough for a sustained revision cycle across several topics.

£11.99Buy 15 credits ↗

40reviews

Forty review credits

Best suited to intensive course-wide practice and repeated redrafting.

£24.99Buy 40 credits ↗

Use it responsibly

What the reviewer can and cannot do

It can identify likely strengths, omissions, question drift and weak evaluation in a practice response.
It can be wrong about a fact, quotation, level or mark; verify important feedback with your teacher and course sources.
It will not generate a replacement essay, guarantee a grade or make an official assessment decision.
Use it for low-stakes practice and redrafting, never as evidence in a dispute about formal marking.