Key Terms
Glossary
- Young-Earth Creationism
- Genesis 1–2 is literal and historically accurate. The earth is ~6,000 years old. Evolution is false. Science must conform to scripture.
- Intelligent Design (ID)
- The complexity of life (irreducible complexity — Behe) shows it was designed by an intelligent agent. Kitzmiller v Dover (2005): US court ruled ID is religious, not scientific.
- Theistic evolution
- God creates through evolutionary processes; Darwin's mechanism is the 'how', God is the 'why'.
- NOMA
- (Gould) Non-overlapping magisteria — science and religion address different questions.
Key Scholars
1809–1882John Polkinghorne
1930–2021Michael Behe
b.1952Stephen Jay Gould
1941–2002Richard Dawkins
b.1941Teilhard de Chardin
1881–1955
Learn AO1 knowledge
Models of relationship (Ian Barbour)
| Model | View | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Conflict | Science and religion are at war — incompatible | Dawkins (science wins); young-earth creationism (religion wins) |
| Independence | Science and religion address different questions — no conflict | NOMA (Gould): non-overlapping magisteria |
| Dialogue | Mutual conversation, similarities in method and questions | Barbour, Polkinghorne |
| Integration | Attempt to combine — theology informed by science | Process theology, theistic evolution |
Creationism & Intelligent Design
Evolution and Christian responses
- Theistic evolution: God creates through evolutionary processes. Darwin's mechanism is the "how"; God is the "why." Supported by most mainstream Christian bodies including the Roman Catholic Church.
- Teilhard de Chardin: Evolution is the unfolding of creation towards the Omega Point — the full realisation of Christ in the cosmos.
John Polkinghorne
Key debates
- Does evolution undermine the doctrine of the Fall (if there was no historical Adam)?
- Can God act in a world governed by natural laws? (Divine action and miracles)
- Does the Big Bang support or undermine belief in creation?
Evaluate AO2 arguments
Which model fits best?
- Conflict (Dawkins / young-earth creationism): rhetorically strong but arguably a false dichotomy.
- Independence (Gould's NOMA): avoids conflict but may keep the disciplines artificially apart.
- Dialogue / Integration (Polkinghorne, theistic evolution, Teilhard): allows genuine engagement — the mainstream Christian response.
Compare the scholars
A high-level essay does more than name thinkers: it identifies exactly where their assumptions, methods or conclusions diverge.
| Scholar | Core position | AO2 use | Quotation or evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Darwin | On the Origin of Species; evolution by natural selection. | The scientific challenge at the heart of Christianity and Science. | Use the scholar's argument accurately; a quotation is optional. |
| John Polkinghorne | Physicist-priest; science and theology as complementary. | The key advocate of dialogue/integration in Christianity and Science. | Use the scholar's argument accurately; a quotation is optional. |
| Michael Behe | Intelligent Design; the argument from irreducible complexity. | Cite for Intelligent Design; note Kitzmiller v Dover (2005). | Use the scholar's argument accurately; a quotation is optional. |
| Stephen Jay Gould | Proposed NOMA — non-overlapping magisteria of science and religion. | The key exponent of the independence model in Christianity and Science. | Use the scholar's argument accurately; a quotation is optional. |
| Richard Dawkins | Evolutionary biologist and prominent advocate of the conflict model. | Cite for the conflict model in Christianity and Science. | Use the scholar's argument accurately; a quotation is optional. |
| Teilhard de Chardin | Jesuit; evolution unfolding towards the Omega Point. | Cite for integration of evolution and faith in Christianity and Science. | Use the scholar's argument accurately; a quotation is optional. |
Practise Exam questions
Build a response
- Assess whether evolution poses a challenge to Christian belief.
- 'The conflict model is the most accurate description of the relationship between science and religion.' Discuss.
- Evaluate Intelligent Design as a credible alternative to Darwinian evolution.
Recall and self-test
Retrieval cards
Say the point aloud before revealing it.
Self-test
Match the term to its definition
Choose one answer for each question. Your best score stays on this device.
Related and synoptic links
Recommended reading
Affiliate/paid links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. The recommendation is editorial; no price is shown because availability and pricing can change.
OCR A Level Religious Studies: Developments in Christian Thought (2020, ISBN 9781510479968)
An OCR-focused course textbook for securing the specification foundations of the Christian Thought paper.
View on AmazonMy Revision Notes: OCR Christian Thought (ISBN 9781510418066)
A concise companion for consolidating thinkers, debates and exam-focused recall.
View on AmazonMcGrath & Thomas, Christian Theology: An Introduction, 7th ed. (ISBN 9781394202881)
A detailed academic introduction for richer theological context and more precise evaluation.
View on Amazon

